The reason why I have chosen this page for my case study is because the big title (name of the movie) grabs the audience's attention straight away. The reason for this is because it is big and bold, on top of the page and the first thing the audience will read. Therefore I am definitely going to use the same technique by writing the name of my film in caps lock big and bold on top of the page. The font here is simple with no curly edges because that would be 'too much' etc, which makes it simple and not too-crowded.
The column in the far left is something that I want to use too. Here it uses a bright colour which suits to the image, as yellow and orange go good together. The reason why I want to use the same column is because it informs the audience about the most important aspects such as the plot, director, release date and main/famous actors. It is put in the left hand upper corner because again people start reading on from there. The words 'JANUARY 20' and words on the left such as 'released, certificate and director are put in bold to make it look more organised.
The stars on the right hand corner show the rating of the movie. However, I think this should be put on top of the page or in a brighter colour, to draw the audience's attention more. I would personally flick over a film review with a low rating. Yet that might be another reason for them to put it in little: for people to read it and then look at the rating. But the reason why I would put it on top is to inform people up front on whether it is a good movie or not (according to the magazine).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/793db/793db339951bf77061f2c72f0e9428546c7990c2" alt=""
The font used for the review is simple and not curly. This gives the page a relaxed feeling, together with the block letters written in big. The reason for the written text to be in a arial-type font instead of Sherif is because if it was in a curly sherif font, the title and big titles should be the same for it to suit together.